Rocchi admits controversial Udinese 1-1 Lazio goal needs IFAB clarification

Rocchi admits controversial Udinese 1-1 Lazio goal needs IFAB clarification

UDINE, ITALY – DECEMBER 27: Keinan Davis of Udinese Calcio scores a first goal during the Serie A match between Udinese Calcio and SS Lazio at Stadio Friuli on December 27, 2025 in Udine, Italy. (Photo by Marco Rosi – SS Lazio/Getty Images)


Refereeing designator Gianluca Rocchi explains why the controversial Udinese goal will be ‘discussed with IFAB’ over a gap in the rules, but assures Lazio he’s ‘ready to resign if anyone doubts our good faith.’

The last-gasp equaliser caused a firestorm in the Italian sports media when Keinan Davis charged down a shot with his arm and then scored the goal for a 1-1 result.

His back was to the initial finish and the arm in a natural position, but the rules state that handball is still punishable if he “scored immediately after the ball has touched their hand/arm (even if the touch was accidental).”

The trouble is that the rules don’t specify what ‘immediately’ means, as while Davis kept hold of the ball to score, there were also nine seconds between the handball and the goal.

Rocchi concedes Udinese-Lazio goal is in grey area

ROME, ITALY - DECEMBER 05: AIA Referee Designator Gianluca Rocchi attends the FIGC Unveiling of the new Sports Justice Code at Foro Italico on December 5, 2022 in Rome, Italy. (Photo by Paolo Bruno/Getty Images)
AIA chief Gianluca Rocchi (Photo by Paolo Bruno/Getty Images)

“If you look at the Meister goal in Pisa-Fiorentina, there are one or two seconds between the handball and the goal, so that is immediate,” explained designator Rocchi on DAZN’s programme Open VAR.

“In this case, after recovering the ball with his arm, the player dribbles and touches four times. This cannot be considered immediate.

“The main problem is there isn’t a parameter we can base a decision on, so as a referee I would ask for there to be clarity, so we can give as objective a response as possible.

“I cannot right now say to the referee and VAR that they were wrong, because it is not immediate. We will turn the footage over to the IFAB to understand if we were right or wrong, as the wording does cause a problem.”

A solution suggested could be that if the player keeps hold of the ball after the handling offence without any further passes, then it should be considered immediate, but that is currently not in the rules.

Lazio were furious over the decision to allow the goal without even suggesting a VAR On-Field Review, going so far as to send a formal letter of protest to the Lega Serie A.

MILAN, ITALY - DECEMBER 04: Gianluca Rocchi and Daniele Orsato receive the AIC Oscar del Calcio Awards on December 04, 2023 in Milan, Italy. (Photo by Pier Marco Tacca/Getty Images )
MILAN, ITALY – DECEMBER 04: Gianluca Rocchi and Daniele Orsato receive the AIC Oscar del Calcio Awards on December 04, 2023 in Milan, Italy. (Photo by Pier Marco Tacca/Getty Images )

“I won’t get into political debates. I simply told everyone, including the Lega Serie A and FIGC, that if someone doesn’t believe in our good faith, I will resign tomorrow,” replied Rocchi.

“We try to make as few errors as possible, clearly an incident like this one is difficult to explain, but we are trying to outline why we made that decision.

“Our objective is to make as few mistakes as possible. If someone doesn’t believe that, it is not my problem.”


Source From: Football Italia

Source link

Total
0
Shares
Related Posts
This website has updated its privacy policy in compliance with changes to European Union data protection law, for all members globally. We’ve also updated our Privacy Policy to give you more information about your rights and responsibilities with respect to your privacy and personal information. Please read this to review the updates about which cookies we use and what information we collect on our site. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our updated privacy policy.
Blogarama - Blog Directory