Newcastle and Mike Ashley at war! Former Magpies owner ‘fails in bid to stop exclusive JD Sports deal’ surrounding next year’s shirts – but the Sports Direct boss ‘could yet take the club to court’

Newcastle and Mike Ashley at war! Former Magpies owner ‘fails in bid to stop exclusive JD Sports deal’ surrounding next year’s shirts – but the Sports Direct boss ‘could yet take the club to court’

Former Newcastle owner Mike Ashley’s Sports Direct have failed in a bid to sell the club’s shirts in their stores next season, according to a report.

The Magpies have agreed an exclusive deal with JD Sports that will see their jerseys sold in only their stores and the official club shop.

Ashley was in charge of Newcastle between 2007 and 2021 before selling it to the Saudi Arabian Public Investment Fund for £305million.

He received widespread criticism for his work as owner of the club, with the north east outfit now flourishing on the field having qualified for the Champions League this season under new manager Eddie Howe.

Now, according to Sky Sports, the two parties are at war once again with The Competition Appeals Tribunal unanimously rejecting Sports Direct’s request for an immediate injunction to stop the deal.

Mike Ashley’s Sports Direct have failed in bid to sell Newcastle’s shirts in stores next season

Sports Direct had claimed an exclusive agreement between JD Sports and Newcastle would damage competition

Sports Direct had claimed an exclusive agreement between JD Sports and Newcastle would damage competition 

Ashley owned Newcastle between 2007 and 2021 and regularly received criticism from fans

Ashley owned Newcastle between 2007 and 2021 and regularly received criticism from fans

Sports Direct had alleged that competition will be damaged by the agreement, with lawyers previously arguing that the retailer, branding themselves the ‘home of football supplies’, should be able to sell cheaper shirts to prevent fans being impacted.

The tribunal are said to have judged the factor as ‘neutral’ when it came to their decision.

Ashely, who could regularly be seen donning a Newcastle replica shirt on match days during his time in charge of the club, lodged a £1.533 million claim at the Competition Appeal Tribunal in March, though his claim has now been swiftly dismissed.

The claim stated that the club has ‘abused its dominant position in the market’ by refusing to supply the new Adidas kit for the 2024-25 season to Sports Direct.

Details within the claim alleged that a decision to prefer rival JD Sports and also sell exclusively through the manufacturers, club shop and website, is a breach of the Competitions Act.

Sports Direct said their order, which would have been based on a similar shipment from last year and not been inflated, would have been for 50,900 units of Newcastle merchandise, most of which would have been the famous black and white striped shirts.

Ashley claimed that the deal between Newcastle and the rival store could hit Geordie fans in the pocket as shirt prices would be higher.

The tribunal said that the retailer would be able to take the club to court over the matter at a later date.

Having been produced by Castore for a number of years, the club binned their partnership ahead of next season, signing a multi-year agreement with Adidas. 

Fans often protested against his ownership and celebrated when he sold club after 14 years

Fans often protested against his ownership and celebrated when he sold club after 14 years

His company, self-branded the ‘home of football supplies’, had lodged a £1.533 million claim at the Competition Appeal Tribunal

A consortium backed by Saudi Arabia crown prince Mohammed bin Salman now own Newcastle

A consortium backed by Saudi Arabia crown prince Mohammed bin Salman now own Newcastle

The three-person panel wrote on the judgement: ‘To suggest that there was some obligation on Newcastle United FC and Adidas to ensure in their arrangements (i.e. between the Club and Adidas) that supply to Sports Direct be maintained over time represents a significant fetter on competition, not an enhancement of it,

The judgement added: ‘We expect speedy (and, ideally, agreed) proposals from the parties, failing which the Tribunal will, in short order, make its own proposals.’

The lawsuit represents the salvo in a string of collisions between the former and current owners of Newcastle.

Previous flare-ups were over the details of a loan to facilitate the takeover, and the removal of Sports Direct branding around the club’s St James’ Park ground.


Source From: Football | Mail Online

Source link

Total
0
Shares
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts
This website has updated its privacy policy in compliance with changes to European Union data protection law, for all members globally. We’ve also updated our Privacy Policy to give you more information about your rights and responsibilities with respect to your privacy and personal information. Please read this to review the updates about which cookies we use and what information we collect on our site. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our updated privacy policy.
Blogarama - Blog Directory